2007-02-05 // 23:40:39
Emily
a big big compliment to your father!

^ Thanks Emily, I'll tell him.

2006-12-22 // 10:30:53
admin
hi pola_me
great, great movie - thanx alot for sharing it with us!

about the technical stuff, please read my techie-blabla at the recoded version.
the pixelation during some transitions, as well as the interlace artefacts are all part of the original mov you uploaded, no codec/conversion can get rid of those, I cant do miracles although I often wish I could.
there are really huge pixels visible also in the .mov when viewed in the huge original size.
did you enlarge the mov to this huge size or did you really digitize so big?
I would say the flv version online now is equally "good" as the .mov, also in the small (320x240) version.
what do you think?
with which one should I replace this one here?
I would go for the small one, not so much cause of the filesize (small one is 8MB, huge one 10MB) but more cause I think almost no computer can decode/playback the huge version fast enuff (it is "ruckeling" alot on my laptop)
please tell me.
or do you wanna try to re-digitize again, trying to avoid the pixelation and interlace artefacts?

^ Thanks a lot for your help, it looks just great. The movie was first digitalized to DVD by a lab and I used the DVD to make a QT movie. The original movie is over 20 min long but I thought that this is way too long for watching on the net. So I simple closed one part that I liked and cut it there. I didn't blow it up, I just wanted to keep the resolution, some loses was made in the lab but maybe I could have done a better job, maybe in the future. Right now I think the small one looks just great. Lets use that one so more people will be able to look at it. And again, thanks a lot!

2006-12-22 // 01:06:13
po3p
That's really gorgeous! But, please, give us a better quality version...
And, where is San Antonio (IT)?

^ Ibiza. Thanks for your comment, I told Webmeister about it, I presume he will do it or I have to load up a smaller version, this one is on 24 MB