2006-10-08 // 12:03:10
LiA
No, I know tzhe effect,
but I myself have not seen the CONTRAST this intense so far.

Ah, just read you did indeed adjust it. That is what I meant :-)
Again, great work, the negatives often come out more interesting, when the subject bears alot of darkness.

I used it here (it is a trio, the link leads to one of them)
»link


Again, adore it alot.
-Lia

^ Thank you Lia. Aha, I realized why you asked this question. You used 667 negative but I used 665 negative. 667 'paper negative' needs a lot of contrast adjusting, because the image is very faint, but the 665 - if exposed well - just like an ordinary BW negative. Your triptych is excellent (see my comments). I miss some of your shots that were in my fav pix list - and you removed them :-( And thank you again the positive comments on my images.

2006-10-04 // 17:34:04
LiA
you did work on the contrast digitally afetrwards I assume?
beautiful work!

^ I suppose you asking about sabattier-effect (light branches). It is real, it's on the negative, I didn't do it digitally. But there's a contrast adjustment on the whole photo because pola665 gives you a BW negative so you have to post-process either digital or conventional way. Thank You Lia.