2008-12-02 // 00:49:12
mattjudas
wonderful image!
 |
^ thank you. also thank you for looking at old uploads. it's becoming rare, unfortunately. it's a favourite of mine. I'm glad it speaks to others as well. |
2008-08-04 // 15:52:52
Urizen
Nerdic comment, by the way: As far as i've seen Fuji FP-400B doesn't give any usable negatives (or my packs are too expired) And i got some 107 and 108 film that i'm nervous to use. I'm starting to love pack film as much as i loved integral!
|
^ ah, what a pity. i had hoped it is similar to 672, though i can't judge for 672, but it should be the same than 572. tried my first 672 the weekend and it was all dry. expired just recently! i seriously start to believe that the last years produced films are produced or packed in a worse manner. i had less problems with older films. well.. (the above one is 4 years expired, btw) things like 107,8 are really old. but you never know! general tip is to expose with a bit more light and develop a bit longer for those |
2008-08-04 // 14:06:32
Urizen
Awesome
|
^ gracias, amigo |
2008-08-02 // 01:24:27
Reindeer
This one makes me clap with delight. Happy to have seen the original, and to have met the noble clothes horse.
|
^ and the serious curious aristoc(r)at |