2008-10-28 // 14:46:43
Esther.Z.Schnickenacke
And 2006?
^
2006 is good- the ones i took of the trees in my gallery- just before the hospital shots are 2006...

2008-10-28 // 13:32:56
Esther.Z.Schnickenacke
Rubbish as in not working at all or as in unexciting effects?
^
well unexciting and tends to only develop half the image...

2008-10-28 // 13:26:17
Esther.Z.Schnickenacke
What do you reckon is the ideal expiry period? Four years?
^
this was 2004 and (despite the camera shake and blur as this was handheld- i'm lazy and had a tripod mount and tripod right there!)- I think the film was as good as I could hope for. almost as good as it was when fresh. 2004 was a good year..anything before it a bit icky. Every 2005 film i have had has been rubbish.