2009-05-29 // 19:55:19
orezemit
print size 17x22 sounds like the epson 3800 i'm expecting delivery of today. ;-)

i would say it depends on the gallery size & what you want to see. in the right place i love large prints. if space is limited then smaller is better. are you printing yourself? mostly i think it's what you want to see from the beautiful negs.

i'm anxious to see some output with this new printer. both colour & b/w. i talked with g. today about scanners too. i use a cheap one right now & he recommends the V700 (which he tells me you also use - quite well it seems to me). do you also use the sheet film holders from »link ?

if you care to give a scanning novice some tips drop me a guestbook note.

i always look forward to your work Peter.

2009-05-29 // 10:21:43
BJMAURICE
Yes sir!

^ merci merci

2009-05-29 // 08:45:06
a5ma
admire !!!

^ thanks!

2009-05-29 // 01:10:46
marmouse
!

^ !!! ;-)

2009-05-29 // 01:02:35
orezemit
the depth of this photo is incredible.
this is an especially unique polaroid Peter.
even clicking the + link isn't enough.
i'd love to see this blown up to at least 10x its original size.
bravo.

^ thank you sir! i´m actually right now thinkoing of an exhibition with just my 665:s with a printzise size about 17"x22"... you think i should gp bigger?