2009-10-29 // 00:20:16
orezemit
must be different than the zip i have. i'll have to dig mine out & look. i have a blue & brown now. gave away the white & red. i've never tried the inv. process either. more notes.


wm - we were exchanging emails while both being foolish in the news. his last msg. (~90 ago) he was going to bed. says he's been working though.

ps/ love that look. who was it for?

^ that's the electric zip then. different camera. the zip is like the square version of the (big) swinger. i always wanted to have all colour versions of the electric ones. nice plastic colours. just for display. but then again.. i have so many stuff. too much. and am getting rid of it. trying to, well. but there always comes a reason again, to use a specific one. argh. oh. there was a transparent as well. which would make the copleteness difficult anyway. (have the 600 tr. though, but they appear more often). i have a crush on these negatives. it's what i started with in the very beginning. oh. she took it »link . one of her few :) (our kitchen. after dinner. a regular. the cooking, not the polaroid ;)

2009-10-28 // 23:53:30
orezemit
this window.
open 24h now.
amazing depth.
pinhole zip? no, too sharp. a perspective trick maybe.
ag-1 + inv.
tempted to copy & reverse but i respect your art & like this so much as is. so no.

...slowly moving on.

^ uh, there would be no sense in posting negatives, no? i mean - most of the time. the lines on the edges come from the solarisation, but overall, it's the zip. pretty small f-stop, 3000asa only, plus flash and close.. it's the only reason i bought it, i was curious. of course. and i like the 'yes'. i think this was the evening i once had a bluedot bulb which had turned pink. luckily, it didn't splatter. it was working like a normal bulb: press the button-on. release-off. and so on. funny little one.

^ oh. the link worked, btw. (and i only clicked it because it was faster than pressing apple-n in the browser) is webbo working? wondering.