2014-10-23 // 13:46:38
g.
that's probably because of the nature of polaroids, they have this, call it force?, more in them than argentic. I've been reflecting about this myself lately but came to the conclusion that thus, it's also way (and a reason) more worthy to take the challenge ;)

^ Agreed ! I easily have better "less is more " results on argentic !

^ This is about as close to "less is more" that I could get on Polaroid ;) »link

2014-10-23 // 13:07:51
g.
very intense (and beautiful) portrait.

very fine and wonderful, philippe. I have been thinking that before, but lately it becomes even more obvious for me; the less plain graphic your pictures are (I'd even say - become), the even more intense they get.
Well, of course one has to know what one is speaking about, if less is more shall work, isn't it so?

^ Yes I believe more & more everyday that less is more. It's just that I have the hardest time to do it in Polaroid... It seems easier with argentic, somehow... But your comment is very accurate ! Thank you.