2007-03-02 // 19:58:41
silvana
love this dip. here!*

^ :-)

2007-03-02 // 02:59:39
oelklaus
Question... did you project a neg on the film, like from the enlarger? I don't undersatnd how it's a polagram if the fish wasn't transparent...or maybe it was. Please enlighten me.
Thanks

^ Ok, all the process has been done inside my darkroom where I've projected a 120mm b/w neg on the polaroid film using an enlarger that I usually use for b/w print. The fish was transparent because it was on the negative film, of course. Maybe it's not correct to call it polagram but I really I don't how I should call it... I hope it's all clear now... btw thanks for your kind words ;)

2007-03-02 // 02:55:51
oelklaus
I like this one better than fig 1. both are exceptional, but this says more.

2007-03-01 // 18:07:32
tonkatsu76
love this!

^ I'm glad you like it

2007-03-01 // 15:49:37
joster
I've never liked fish but I love this! This should win the "EAT" project.

^ thanks a lot joster ;)

2007-03-01 // 10:38:02
docteurgio
this is ART

^ THANK YOU!

2007-03-01 // 09:34:12
polaspin
Una composizione veramente geniale ! Bellissima V+F !!!

^ ti ringrazio moltissimo!!

2007-03-01 // 07:37:01
hasp22
loop sensoriale... combinazione perfetta!